所有分类
  • 所有分类
  • 次元合集

The study was held using Qualtrics six (variation 2015; Qualtrics, Provo, UT)

The study was held using Qualtrics six (variation 2015; Qualtrics, Provo, UT)

Participants

Eighty-four adult American English speakers, recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk and paid $2 (Lag1 group) or $3 (Lag5 group), were included in the final analyses (nLag1 = 40, nLag5 = 44 5 ).

Processes

People saw sentences one by one and you will rated just how “pure otherwise unnatural” per sentence “intuitively” sounded in it using a scale of 1 = “Totally Unacceptable” in order to 5 = “Completely Acceptable.” They certainly were requested so you can speed phrases regardless of in the past viewed issues and you will backtracking was handicapped.

Design

Exactly how many phrases separating for every prime from its subsequent address are ranged between sufferers: Prime-target sets was indeed separated either of the one unrelated phrase (Lag1) or of the four not related sentences (Lag5). Crucially, the quantity of perfect-address pairs is actually a http://datingranking.net/pl/farmers-dating-site-recenzja similar round the each other Lag1 and you may Lag5 types; just the number of phrases intervening between primes and their objectives ranged. Especially, people ranked three groups of best-address sets for each status (Dining table step one), having all in all, six sets inside for each and every phrase types of and you can a dozen perfect-address sets altogether. In addition, members rated 54 or 126 filler/intervener phrases into the Lag1 and Lag5, respectively; these types of didn’t tend to be area-related violations. Additionally, to handle issues you to players you are going to “give up on” or follow a reply equalization means (Sprouse, 2009), professionals rated an about equivalent amount of ungrammatical and you may grammatical sentences during the period of whole data.

Sentence Types

Based on earlier in the day functions (Kluender and you can Kutas, 1993; Phillips, 2006; Droop et al., 2007; Hofmeister and you may Sag, 2010; an such like.), i predict running challenge (gauged via studying time slowdowns) to arise in the word 5 to own CNPC and Subject countries (come across Table 2), however, crucially, for various explanations. In the two cases, the latest parser initiate definitely looking a wh-gap when they experience the newest phrase-first wh-statement (‘Who’/‘What’; Crain and you can Fodor, 1985; Frazier and you can Clifton, 1989; Gibson and you may Hickok, 1993; etcetera.). From inside the CNPC isles, this new handling complications questioned during the word 5 should be caused by what is referred to as occupied-pit impact: The fresh parser posits a space into wh-filler on basic you can easily standing, keyword 5 (Dining table dos); but, whether or not it experience the head of one’s isle statement (‘the’) right here, brand new parser understands that this is simply not a possible status to own the fresh new wh-gap and should enhance its 1st parse. We together with assume a vacation website of running problem within term seven, where in actuality the parser knowledge the fresh complementizer (elizabeth.g., ‘that’). Right here, because complementizer indicators the end of the previous clause and you can as there is zero readily available pit reputation about initially clause, brand new parser is always to realize that the new wh-filler has been obtained from in this a stuck clause headed of the an elaborate-NP – in other words, your wh-filler might have been extracted from in this a beneficial CNPC island. For this reason, the expected processing challenge from the term eight carry out match the newest part where in actuality the parser has actually acknowledged the illegal, ungrammatical removal. Actually, these types of forecasts come in range as to what i to see about stop-being-grammatical activity (see Differences when considering CNPC and you can Topic Countries: New Stop Becoming Grammatical Task): Particular comprehenders begin seeing CNPC islands as unsuitable in the keyword 5 towards majority of comprehenders judging CNPC countries to be improper by-word eight.

Desk dos. Try State-of-the-art-NP Constraint (CNPC) and Subject island sentences with involved word numbers. Shaded region denotes area for appeal.

Each sentence type of, needs happened ongoing however, best sentences was basically manipulated in a fashion that primes and you can plans sometimes lexically regular (i) the fresh new island-developing DP blocking wh-extraction otherwise (ii) a phrase not related on the isle (the brand new matrix verb in the CNPC isles and you may adjunct words when you look at the Subject islands). These four repetition standards (Desk 1) had been varied within this victims and rotated using a standard Latin Square structure. (Observe that repetition models commonly as compared to a no-repetition standard).

原文链接:http://ciyuanshan.com/12569.html,转载请注明出处~~~

0

评论0

新春优惠活动!原XXX包年VIP,现XX;原XXX终身VIP,现XXX。随着资源不断增多,随时提价!
没有账号? 注册  忘记密码?

社交账号快速登录